37th EuroQol Plenary 2020 – A Virtual Meeting
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Location
Virtual meeting. A personal link to the meeting has been sent to each participant by email. Please contact the EQ Office for questions.
Time table of different time zones
Time zones | 16 September | 17 September |
PDT | 12.00 | 12.00 |
EDT | 15.00 | 15.00 |
BST | 20.00 | 20.00 |
CEST | 21.00 | 21.00 |
SGT | 03.00 | 03.00 |
AEST | 05.00 | 05.00 |
NZT | 07.00 | 07.00 |
Plenary Meeting Information
Papers Day 1: 16 September
- Day 1_PA1. Luo N and Rand K. Towards a standard data analysis protocol for EQ-5D-5L value set studies First draft and initial testing
- Day 1_PA2. Pullenayegum E et al. Using Discrete Choice Experiments as a stand-alone approach to valuation a draft protocol
- Day 1_PA3. Mukuria C et al. Applying EQ-PVT to the EQ-HWB classifier a qualitative pilot study
- Day 1_PA4. Teni FS et al. A longitudinal study of health-related quality of life of patients in 10 Swedish National Quality Registers
- Day 1_PA5. Lubetkin E I et al. The impact of COVID-19 on health inequities as measured by the EQ-5D-5L results from New York
Papers Day 2: 17 September
- Day 2_PA1. Dewilde S et al. Exploration of the reasons why health state valuation differs for children compared to adults
- Day 2_PA2. Prevolnik Rupel V et al. Comparison of adult and adolescent preferences towards EQ-5D-Y health states
- Day 2_PA3. Pan T et al. How do the utilities for PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-5L compare A comparison of PROPr and EQ-5D-5L value sets, and implications…
- Day 2_PA4. Engel L et al. An exploratory analysis of the paindiscomfort dimension of the EQ-5D-5L in people living with physical and mental health
- Day2_PA5. Kind P and Luo N. EQ-5D, What does it measure – and how would we (do we) know