skip to Main Content

Commentaries, editorials and guidance documents

The publications listed below are personal or institutional views on the choice between EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L. These were published as commentaries, editorials or guidance documents.

Study TitleFirst AuthorJournalYearType
Position statement on use of the EQ-5D-5L valuation setNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence2017policy document
3L, 5L, What the L? A NICE ConundrumDevlin NPharmacoeconomics2018editorial
EQ-5D-5L: Smaller steps but a major step change?Brazier JHealth Economics2018editorial
Once Bitten Twice Shy: Thinking Carefully Before Adopting the EQ-5D-5LRound JPharmacoeconomics20118editorial
EQ-5D: Moving from Three Levels to FiveLloyd AValue in Health2018editorial
Bad reasons not to use the EQ-5D-5LSampson CThe Academic Health Economists’ Blog2018commentary
Guideline for economic evaluations in health careZorginstituut Nederland2016policy document

 

(Version 18JUN2018)

Back To Top
×Close search
Search